Whereas the first novel was a serene, internal narrative centered around the concept of choosing the life one desires, this particular one is highly external, delving into the realm of how to manage the life that is forcibly imposed upon you. While the first novel was a profound reflection on a culture that has developed in isolation, this one focuses on the themes of colonialism and authoritarianism.
In certain aspects, I have a preference for the first novel. However, in other respects, I find myself drawn to this one. They both present vastly different approaches to a very tangible and solid world. Similar to Le Guin's Earthsea series, this novel does not immediately pick up where the first one left off, nor does it follow the same character. Instead, it is somewhat like The Tombs of Atuan, as we commence in a new location with a new narrator. Nevertheless, the previous narrator does make an appearance and has an impact on the story, although we never get to view the world from his perspective again.
At times, it can be brutally harsh, while at other moments, it展现出 a certain beauty. All in all, it remains a quiet and meditative novel.
I'm not entirely sure. I have an affinity for this sort of thing, but you might not.
I can't read Ben Trilogy from the beginning. I always start from the end or the middle.