...
Show More
In "Lies My Teacher Told Me", sociology professor James Loewen conducts a detailed examination of American history and the reasons why high school students not only detest the subject but also emerge from class with a poor understanding. His conclusion - the textbooks are at fault.
In the 1992 version of this book, Loewen closely inspected the 12 most commonly used history textbooks and uncovered that their true objective was not to comprehensively educate American students about their history but rather to achieve the following: to present events in a manner that prevents students from feeling bad about the less-than-noble actions of our ancestors; to create glossy heroic images of major historical figures without any hint of human complexity; to formulate the concept of continuous progress, thereby reducing students' awareness of existing social inequalities; to include every possible factoid that might make the book more appealing to people in different locations, and most importantly, to completely avoid offending any group that might have the power to prevent the textbook's adoption and thus reduce sales.
The ultimate result of this is textbooks that are both mind-numbingly dull and extremely incomplete. Loewen endeavors to rectify the latter by vividly highlighting the horrors of our past that are omitted from these books, ranging from the brutal enslavement of natives by Columbian explorers to the upsurge of racist suppression of blacks after the Civil War to the underhanded actions of a government that often acts at the behest of special interests rather than the broader citizenry.
When addressing facts such as the slave ownership of the founding fathers and the blatant racism of Woodrow Wilson, Loewen points out what literature students have always known - complex, conflicted humans make for far more interesting subjects than one-dimensional superheroes. However, by neglecting to discuss the shadowy aspects of both our history and the people within it, our textbooks convey the idea that history is a set of uninteresting facts to be learned and perfect heroes to be emulated rather than a constantly evolving compilation of interconnected and often conflicting ideas and the people who grapple with them. By denying students the ability to view history in this way, textbooks also deprive them of the ability to learn how to consider competing ideas, analyze their strengths and weaknesses, and in the process, discover how to think for themselves.
At a time when so much of America seems to have lost touch with even the most fundamental facts of the present, let alone the distant past, Loewen's book is of utmost importance for anyone not only interested in our nation's past but also in its future.
That being said, this is not an easy book to read. In an attempt to provide balance to the mindless positive propaganda of our textbooks, Loewen delves so deeply into the most heinous aspects of the American past that I often found this book difficult to endure. It's not that I was unfamiliar with the basic atrocities he presents (although I did learn a great deal that I hadn't known before), but the fact that he presents them in such a relentless litany, with only a passing reference to anything positive about America, left even a liberal like me longing to hear something positive about my country. After reading this book, I can envision how incredibly captivating and stimulating a history book that includes both the good and bad sides of America would be and how far it would go in enabling the US citizenry to make better decisions about our future, but unfortunately, this is not that book.
I read the 2007 edition, which addressed the changes that have occurred in the 15 years since the original was published. Although some minor improvements have been made, the current impact on the problem is minimal compared to its magnitude, especially at a time when right-wing fundamentalists on Texas textbook adoption boards are exerting such a significant influence on what students in the rest of the country will and will not read. Until the textbook that Loewen envisions has been written, this will remain a crucial counterweight to conventional American history.
In the 1992 version of this book, Loewen closely inspected the 12 most commonly used history textbooks and uncovered that their true objective was not to comprehensively educate American students about their history but rather to achieve the following: to present events in a manner that prevents students from feeling bad about the less-than-noble actions of our ancestors; to create glossy heroic images of major historical figures without any hint of human complexity; to formulate the concept of continuous progress, thereby reducing students' awareness of existing social inequalities; to include every possible factoid that might make the book more appealing to people in different locations, and most importantly, to completely avoid offending any group that might have the power to prevent the textbook's adoption and thus reduce sales.
The ultimate result of this is textbooks that are both mind-numbingly dull and extremely incomplete. Loewen endeavors to rectify the latter by vividly highlighting the horrors of our past that are omitted from these books, ranging from the brutal enslavement of natives by Columbian explorers to the upsurge of racist suppression of blacks after the Civil War to the underhanded actions of a government that often acts at the behest of special interests rather than the broader citizenry.
When addressing facts such as the slave ownership of the founding fathers and the blatant racism of Woodrow Wilson, Loewen points out what literature students have always known - complex, conflicted humans make for far more interesting subjects than one-dimensional superheroes. However, by neglecting to discuss the shadowy aspects of both our history and the people within it, our textbooks convey the idea that history is a set of uninteresting facts to be learned and perfect heroes to be emulated rather than a constantly evolving compilation of interconnected and often conflicting ideas and the people who grapple with them. By denying students the ability to view history in this way, textbooks also deprive them of the ability to learn how to consider competing ideas, analyze their strengths and weaknesses, and in the process, discover how to think for themselves.
At a time when so much of America seems to have lost touch with even the most fundamental facts of the present, let alone the distant past, Loewen's book is of utmost importance for anyone not only interested in our nation's past but also in its future.
That being said, this is not an easy book to read. In an attempt to provide balance to the mindless positive propaganda of our textbooks, Loewen delves so deeply into the most heinous aspects of the American past that I often found this book difficult to endure. It's not that I was unfamiliar with the basic atrocities he presents (although I did learn a great deal that I hadn't known before), but the fact that he presents them in such a relentless litany, with only a passing reference to anything positive about America, left even a liberal like me longing to hear something positive about my country. After reading this book, I can envision how incredibly captivating and stimulating a history book that includes both the good and bad sides of America would be and how far it would go in enabling the US citizenry to make better decisions about our future, but unfortunately, this is not that book.
I read the 2007 edition, which addressed the changes that have occurred in the 15 years since the original was published. Although some minor improvements have been made, the current impact on the problem is minimal compared to its magnitude, especially at a time when right-wing fundamentalists on Texas textbook adoption boards are exerting such a significant influence on what students in the rest of the country will and will not read. Until the textbook that Loewen envisions has been written, this will remain a crucial counterweight to conventional American history.