The topic at hand took a somewhat political turn, yet I found myself still quite enjoying the refutation of the "gut-reaction" thinking that is so prevalent in the world today.

In our modern society, it seems that people are often quick to form opinions based on their initial instincts or emotions, without taking the time to carefully consider the facts or different perspectives. This kind of hasty thinking can lead to misunderstandings, conflicts, and ineffective solutions.

However, the refutation presented offered a refreshing alternative. It encouraged a more rational and thoughtful approach, one that takes into account the complexity of the issues and the need for evidence-based reasoning. By challenging the "gut-reaction" mindset, it opened up the possibility for more informed and meaningful discussions.

Overall, while the political aspect added an extra layer of complexity, the refutation of the "gut-reaction" thinking was a valuable and thought-provoking contribution.

This is truly a terrible book.

It seems to have been very poorly thought through.

The author comes across as an awful right wing dickhead.

It's an audio book, which might have been an interesting format if the content wasn't so bad.

The ideas presented are one-sided and lack any real depth or nuance.

The narrator's performance also doesn't do much to enhance the experience.

Overall, I would not recommend this audio book to anyone.

It's a waste of time and money.

There are plenty of other great books out there, both in print and audio format, that are much more worth your while.

Save yourself the disappointment and look elsewhere.

The book, in my opinion, unfortunately did not fulfill what its subtitle promised.

It presents a passionate argument in favor of deep and critical thought. However, when it comes to countering the Blink phenomenon, as it is presented in the book, it falls short.

The inspiration section didn't contribute to the overall purpose as it only showed that these people reached their conclusion through critical thinking.

Nevertheless, the call to arms at the end was well-executed and other parts of the book were captivating. If it weren't for the failure to address the subtitle, it would have easily been a 4-star book.

Overall, while the book has its strengths, the disappointment regarding the subtitle cannot be ignored. It leaves the reader with a sense of unfulfilled expectations.

Perhaps in future editions, the author could focus on strengthening the areas that were lacking and truly deliver on the promise made by the subtitle.

Until then, the book remains a somewhat flawed but still interesting read.

This was one of my late night purchases - probably the result of a snap judgement impaired by tiredness and a "it's only £2.81 including postage so the downside is minimal".

Indeed, I think the title makes it look very promising. I train people in decision-making and one of the things that I firmly believe is that many of us rely on flawed intuition. We seem to think we can get away with listening to our gut, as it were, when in fact we've done very little to increase our awareness of how snap judgments work, the results they bring, and also ways to improve our ability to make quick decisions. I am of the opinion that we need to consciously train our gut, and this is partly achieved through increasing the speed and accuracy of our critical thinking. I was hoping that this book would give me more profound insights and expand my knowledge on this topic.

However, this book feels more like one long rant rather than a truly helpful guide on how to think critically. It has one book reference after another, giving it the feel of a first-year university assignment. The author states in the first chapter that he is not going to provide arguments for why critical analysis is better than snap judgments because that case is already proven. And yet, in my view, he then went on and on with one example after another about the failure of Americans to think.

Most of the stuff mentioned is trivially obvious, such as the fact that most people spend too much time watching TV. I suspect that most of these people were not the target audience (so was this point made, repeatedly, to make his readers feel smug?).

Not bad.

There is indeed some good information in it. The author does make several statements, but unfortunately, there are no footnotes provided for verification in the audible version. This lack of footnotes makes it quite challenging to simply accept the statements at face value.

Especially when it comes to a book on critical thinking, one is naturally inclined to look for such supporting evidence. I am currently in the process of readjusting my ratings, and it will be a little lower.

The reason for this is that I wouldn't recommend this book over some of the others I've read on the same subject.

There are other works that seem to offer a more comprehensive and well-supported exploration of critical thinking, making them more suitable for those seeking a deeper understanding of the topic.

However, it's not to say that this book is without value. It still contains some useful insights that could potentially be beneficial to readers.

Nonetheless, in comparison to other books in the genre, it falls a bit short in terms of credibility and comprehensiveness.

The book was just okay.

Even though the author claimed that it wasn't written solely for American readers, I suspected otherwise.

It seemed to glorify Americans and tout how they are the best at everything.

While the author has the right to write and say whatever he wants about his nation, I couldn't help but wonder what was in it for me.

I didn't think the book came anywhere close to the quality of "Blink."

The examples the author provided seemed to be only for proving his point and counter-attacking Malcolm Gladwell's "Blink" book.

It felt like the book lacked depth and was more of a one-sided argument.

Perhaps if the author had taken a more objective approach and considered different perspectives, the book would have been more engaging and thought-provoking.

As it stands, it was an average read that didn't leave a lasting impression on me.

As noted in the 7 habits, what you keep repeating becomes your habit and you ARE your habits. Your life is a series of + or - similar situations to which you act according to what you're used to.

People need to get used to THINKING! They should be able to evaluate the situation, research solutions, and appraise them in order to select the best one. The most important part is that we need to do this 100+ times a day, with every big or small situation. Until it becomes our habit to think first and then react, that is, until we become smart again.

Do yourself and the world a favor: Read this book. It can help you understand the power of habits and how to change them for the better. By developing good thinking habits, you can make better decisions, solve problems more effectively, and achieve your goals more easily. So don't hesitate, pick up this book and start your journey to a better life today!

This was just recommended to me by Preston, and I think I'm going to give it a look.

I have a particular interest in books that explore the inner workings of the human mind. Preston's recommendation has piqued my curiosity even further.

While I liked Blink, I saw it more as a book about how freaking amazing the brain is, and not a book about how our first, instinctual decision is always the right one. It delved into the fascinating realm of rapid cognition and the incredible capabilities of our brains to make split-second judgments.

However, I'm aware that there are different perspectives and theories when it comes to decision-making. So, we'll see how this new book fares in presenting its ideas. I'm looking forward to exploring its pages and seeing if it can offer new insights and perspectives on the complex topic of human decision-making.

Who knows, maybe it will challenge my existing beliefs and open my eyes to new ways of thinking. Only time will tell as I embark on this literary journey.

The response to "Blink" was quite interesting.

It made me think deeply about the power of our first impressions and snap judgments.

Malcolm Gladwell's exploration of this topic in the book was truly eye-opening.

He presented numerous examples and studies that showed how our unconscious minds can make remarkably accurate assessments in a matter of seconds.

However, he also cautioned that these snap judgments can sometimes be wrong or influenced by biases.

This made me realize the importance of being aware of our own biases and taking the time to consider all the available information before making a decision.

Overall, "Blink" was a thought-provoking read that has had a lasting impact on my way of thinking.

I look forward to reading more of Gladwell's work in the future.

Take away the author's personal vendettas and political standpoint from this book.

Oh wait, that leaves almost nothing.

However, there are still some good points about our society in general.

It is indeed difficult to look past the politics and the lack of resources.

Although, to be honest, I really loved hearing how much he despised Michael Moore.

But once you manage to do that, there is something worth discussing regarding our society's dependence on instant information, social media, and the like.

Our society has become so reliant on these things that it has almost become a part of our daily lives.

We constantly check our phones for the latest news, updates from our friends, and to stay connected with the world.

This dependence has both positive and negative aspects.

On one hand, it allows us to access information quickly and easily.

On the other hand, it can also lead to information overload and a lack of critical thinking.

Overall, this book does have some valid points about our society, despite the author's personal biases.

Addresses the concept of using not only our rational thinking but also our instinct or 6th sense to deal with life's problems. The chapter on debunking the stress "myth" is quite interesting. However, the author gets a bit repetitive. We already understand the idea of thinking our way through problems, and it's true that as a society, we aren't doing enough of it. But please, stop writing about it so much! It would be great if the author could explore other aspects related to this topic. For example, how can we better develop and trust our instinct? Are there specific situations where instinct is more useful than rational thinking? By delving deeper into these areas, the author could provide more valuable insights and make the article more engaging and thought-provoking.

Yep, makes you think. Hard!

This simple statement holds a profound truth. It implies that there is something that has the power to engage our minds and make us think deeply.

When we are faced with a situation or an idea that makes us think hard, it can be both challenging and rewarding. It forces us to step out of our comfort zones and explore new perspectives.

Thinking hard requires focus, concentration, and the ability to analyze and evaluate information. It allows us to gain a deeper understanding of the subject matter and come up with creative solutions or insights.

In a world where we are constantly bombarded with information and distractions, the ability to think hard is becoming increasingly important. It helps us to make informed decisions, solve problems effectively, and grow as individuals.

So, the next time something makes you think hard, embrace it. Use it as an opportunity to expand your mind and learn something new.