...
Show More
Why not name this book as the robert g. Hagstrom portfolio rather than warren buffett portfolio
He only borrow warren buffet name to sell this book, it didn't have or describe any value about warren buffett teaching about value investment or his portfolio in this book, all he said about warren buffett in this book can summarize in just 10 pages, rather than 200+ pages book all talking repeatedly about century ago writer or thinker then to scientists, how is that have anything to do with warren buffett value investing portfolio ?? When most of the book he wrote was about other people thinking about system, system, and system, which keep repeating and repeating, in a paragraph you can find almost half a dozen words keep repeating saying the same word system, or kelly, kelly and kelly
It seems like mostly idea and the value to investment in this book is from the writer himself rather than from buffett, when he come to describe buffett all he can say was a guessing of what might be buffett thinking, not the exactly a real study or research to buffett original thoughts on investment
warren buffett name only appear at the end of all the chapter
Mostly just empty result, couple times talk about investment research and wrote couple pages talking repeatedly boring thing and then there is nothing about his result at all, so what is the point when he wrote so much but didn't prove anything at all
Most time this book just keep repeating promoting his warren buffett way book
This book just waste of time, not worth to read it at all
He only borrow warren buffet name to sell this book, it didn't have or describe any value about warren buffett teaching about value investment or his portfolio in this book, all he said about warren buffett in this book can summarize in just 10 pages, rather than 200+ pages book all talking repeatedly about century ago writer or thinker then to scientists, how is that have anything to do with warren buffett value investing portfolio ?? When most of the book he wrote was about other people thinking about system, system, and system, which keep repeating and repeating, in a paragraph you can find almost half a dozen words keep repeating saying the same word system, or kelly, kelly and kelly
It seems like mostly idea and the value to investment in this book is from the writer himself rather than from buffett, when he come to describe buffett all he can say was a guessing of what might be buffett thinking, not the exactly a real study or research to buffett original thoughts on investment
warren buffett name only appear at the end of all the chapter
Mostly just empty result, couple times talk about investment research and wrote couple pages talking repeatedly boring thing and then there is nothing about his result at all, so what is the point when he wrote so much but didn't prove anything at all
Most time this book just keep repeating promoting his warren buffett way book
This book just waste of time, not worth to read it at all