It was truly interesting to read this so closely after finishing one of his more recent books. It seems that over the years, his works have become more absurd and even obscene. Additionally, there are fewer genuinely decent people in the later ones. I can attribute the first aspect to skittish editors in his earlier career. However, as for the second, I'm not so sure. The easy and perhaps sad answer is that Mr. Hiaasen is becoming disillusioned with humanity. Or maybe it's just that, as "Always Sunny in Philadelphia" has so well shown us, characters don't have to be good people in order to be likable or for us to be interested in the plot. Even though it has been accepted wisdom that you need to have "good people" for the audience to enjoy it. Or perhaps it's a combination of both?
This particular work is less grim and marginally more cheerful than "Bad Monkey". It really did draw me in and give me exactly what I desire from this sort of book - an interesting plot and characters liberally salted with satire and humor. It keeps the reader engaged from start to finish, with its unique blend of elements that make it a truly enjoyable read.