Заобићи друге приче о духовима. These stories are extremely prosaic and empty. They lack the excitement and mystery that one would expect from tales of the supernatural.
Perhaps the authors have failed to capture the essence of the spirit world, or maybe they are simply relying too much on tired clichés and overused tropes.
Whatever the reason, these stories do not engage the reader's imagination or leave a lasting impression.
It is a shame, as the idea of spirits and the afterlife is a fascinating one that has the potential to inspire great works of literature.
Hopefully, future writers will be able to breathe new life into this genre and create stories that are both captivating and thought-provoking.
I had a great interest in reading the story "The Turn of the Screw" after having watched "The Haunting of Bly Manor" and "The Innocents". However, as it turned out, I found myself liking "Washington Square" and "Daisy Miller: A Study" to a much greater extent. After viewing the two adaptations of "The Turn of the Screw", I never had any doubts about the presence of ghosts. But upon reading the original story, I came to the conclusion that there were no actual ghosts. It seemed to me that it was just a woman who was in love with a man she had met only twice and had an unhealthy desire to please him by "saving" her two charges. It is indeed a brilliant way of telling a story, but I had a hard time following the narrative due to the excessive use of commas.
Which is precisely the reason why I prefer the other two stories. In those, I could clearly envision the characters as the commas didn't pose an obstacle.
And I'm truly grateful for that introduction. I don't believe I would have been able to fully appreciate "The Jolly Corner" and "The Beast in the Jungle" without it.