"The Book and the Brotherhood" is truly a masterpiece. In my opinion, it outshines the renowned "A fairly honourable defeat". The story delves into the theme of change, with the incidents involving people and the "Book" that brings about the same. It also explores the uncertainty of human nature, the making and breaking of relationships, and the clashing of ideologies, whether in political theory or personal choice.
I thoroughly relished the part where the brotherhood gathers to deliberate on the future of the book and the intense discussion that ensues, questioning liberal democracy among other things. It was a captivating moment that kept me on the edge of my seat.
Iris Murdoch's writing is simply enchanting. Her ability to create complex characters and weave a compelling narrative is truly remarkable. I am completely in love with her work and can't wait to explore more of her novels.
Murdoch's writing is truly masterful. It is a remarkable display of literary craftsmanship that engages the reader from the very first page. The way she weaves words together, constructs sentences, and develops the narrative is simply outstanding. Each paragraph is a work of art, filled with vivid descriptions, profound insights, and a unique style that is all her own.
The book, in which her masterful writing is on full display, is most definitely worth reading. It offers a rich and immersive experience that takes the reader on a journey through different worlds and emotions. Whether it is the exploration of complex characters, the examination of moral and ethical dilemmas, or the creation of a captivating story, Murdoch's writing elevates the book to a whole new level.
One cannot help but be impressed by the sheer talent and skill that Murdoch brings to her writing. It is a testament to her literary genius and a reason why her books continue to be widely read and admired. So, if you are looking for a book that will not only entertain but also inspire and challenge you, then look no further than Murdoch's work. You will not be disappointed.
Approaching a 600-page book of any kind is always a little daunting for me. However, this twenty-third novel by Iris Murdoch was an absolute delight. It centers around a group of friends who first met at Oxford and explores their relationships over the past thirty-odd years. Some of the group have paired off at different times, one has passed away, and there are numerous instances of unrequited love. At the beginning of the novel, only Jean and Duncan are a couple. The relationship between these two and their friends' involvement in it forms a significant part of the novel and provides much of the drama that drives the narrative. Needless to say, there is a great deal of soul searching, many discussions around fires in cold flats with biscuits and whiskey, and a lot of focus on the minutiae of these lives. The detailed descriptions of their clothes and hair, the food they eat, and the wonderful portrayal of Boyars, another in a line of country houses, all contribute to making this book a rich and engaging read. Around this core group, there are other old friends and relations who add further drama, both humorous and tragic, and of course, a healthy dose of religious and philosophical discussion along the way.
It is not only the relationships between the friends, the 'brotherhood', that the novel encompasses. The titular 'book', written by an old member of the group, Crimond, also plays a crucial role. The others are financing it in a kind of crowd starter scheme. Crimond is an outlier, far to the left politically compared to Rose with her family estate, Gerard with his early retirement and desire to write philosophical commentary, and Duncan and Jean with their family money and government position. An enigmatic and contentious character, he not only引发了arguments among the others with his secrecy about the book but also causes far greater upheavals between the friends and is involved in one of the saddest events in the book.
Just as Crimond is the 'dark' character, we have Tamar, the illegitimate daughter of Viola. Initially seen as a pathetic, fragile, priestess-like figure, dominated by her mother and used by Gerard as a go-between when someone sympathetic and non-judgmental is needed, she suffers as a result. However, after a brush with religion, she ultimately emerges as a stronger, more independent person. Perhaps part of the appeal of this novel is the fact that women's voices feature so prominently. Rose, Jean, Lily, Tamar, and Viola all play significant roles. Rose, in particular, is a favorite, with her outwardly calm demeanor masking passion and conflict beneath. Even Lily, with her scatterbrained ways, manages to evoke empathy. It does seem that only the wretched Viola doesn't have some dependence on the men in her life, at least not if she can help it. Yet, it is not only the women who need someone to lean on in the novel and who require a commitment or 'pact' to secure their loved one. As Rose makes a pact with Gerard, he tries to make one with Jenkin. Duncan and Jean come to a complicit, mutual understanding, as do Lily and Gulliver, and the quartet of Gideon and Patricia, Tamar and her mother. Only Jenkin seems to be self-reliant, often described as living and wanting a simple life. He doesn't boast the intellectualism or ambition of Gerard, Gideon, or Crimond, and as such, he is one of the more appealing characters. Although the losses Gerard experiences in the novel, from his parrot, Grey, when he was a young boy, to his friends and Father, make him a more interesting and empathetic character.
By the end of the book, we have to question whether the 'brotherhood' still exists, regardless of the fate of the book. The group has been reduced and separated, and lines in the sand have been drawn between its members. Either way, it is a compelling read as we follow their fates. Iris Murdoch addresses questions of happiness and what we leave behind, how money and education influence our lives, what we will do for love and how we find it, and how sometimes friendship is enough.
Some favorite Lines
‘Tamar was poised ready to fall in love. It is possible to plan to fall in love. Or perhaps what seems like planning is simply the excited anticipation of the moment, delayed so as to be perfected, of the unmistakable mutual gesture, when eyes meet, hands meet, words fail.’
‘She had had two love affairs, the first inspired by anxiety, the second by pity, for which she blamed herself severely. She was a puritanical child, and she had never been in love.’
‘The sky had become darker since her arrival and now it was raining. Outside the little lawn was strewn with leaves, the yellow chrysanthemums, fading to brown, dropping against their windblown sticks. The room was cold and felt derelict and unlived in, the floor echoed, the house felt dusty and damp. Tamar thought, it’s a senseless house and her heart sank.’
‘He lifted his head like an animal who might, upon some empty hillside, let out some lonely inarticulate cry, not a sad cry, though not without a sad tone or echo, but just a deep irrepressible cry of being. So in silence he let out his noiseless bellow to the chill night air and the stars.’
‘She was wearing bedsocks. She sat crouching and glaring, deepening the two lines above her nose, her eyes wet slits between dry wrinkles. The expensive contact lenses had proved a failure. She evidently felt that since she was taken unawares looking terrible she would make a feature of it.’
This review offers a concise assessment of a particular subject. It states that the subject in question is a bit less manic compared to the 70s Murdochs that the reviewer has read about. The use of the term "manic" implies a certain level of intensity or wildness. By comparing it to the 70s Murdochs, the reviewer is drawing a parallel and highlighting the difference in the level of this characteristic. The reviewer then goes on to say that they enjoyed it. This simple statement indicates that despite the noted difference in mania, the reviewer still found value or pleasure in the subject. Overall, the review provides a quick snapshot of the reviewer's perception and experience, leaving the reader with an idea of how the subject compares to a known reference point and that it was enjoyable.