One might be misled by the title, for this book delves into much more than just the mechanics of power.
In it, I discovered Chomsky's thoughts on multiple subjects: the media, activism, climate change, and so on.
There are so many blatant facts that jump out at you that this book required several breaks for me to meditate on its content.
Ultimately, this reading seems "indispensable" as it sheds light on numerous essential social questions.
I emerged from this reading transformed, as rarely a book has been able to do.
It offers a comprehensive and thought-provoking perspective that challenges our assumptions and forces us to think deeply about the world we live in.
The author's insights are not only intellectually stimulating but also have the potential to inspire action and positive change.
Whether you are interested in politics, sociology, or simply in understanding the world better, this book is a must-read.
It will open your eyes to new ideas and perspectives and leave you with a greater appreciation for the complexity of the issues we face today.
The statements about power presented here are profound. Power is often brutal, and those who possess it tend to use it in a brutal manner. Moreover, those who have held power for a long time have likely been brutal for just as long. Noam Chomsky's work delves into power and its usage by the United States, as well as language and how our usage distorts our perceptions. His views are straightforward yet rarely simple. For example, his take on whether Nixon or Humphrey would end the Vietnam War sooner shows his nuanced thinking. The book is filled with people asking Chomsky ideological questions and receiving practical answers. He also has interesting perspectives on capitalism and revolution. While he isn't always right, his "does this make sense?" filter catches many potential mistakes. Overall, "Understanding Power" is a fascinating read that offers new insights into history and the mind of the author.
"I never wanted to be a radical; it's just that when I started checking the footnotes I couldn't stop."
He isn't perfect, of course. His view of businesspeople seems somewhat one-sided, and he may not fully understand capitalism. However, these minor flaws do not overshadow the book's brilliance. The central point remains: the American government doesn't hate or love its people; it sees them as resources to be used. Americans have blinders that prevent them from recognizing this, and we have a history of violence, sometimes for good reasons and sometimes not. While other countries are similar, studying the United States is crucial for understanding power in global politics. Chomsky is a smart and caring individual with a coherent view of the world, and his work is well worth reading.
The power dynamics between governments and people have always been complex. Once governments lose the ability to control people by force, they often turn to controlling their minds through the propaganda model. In a totalitarian society like in "1984", people can be made to believe anything if they are isolated. Removing individuality is a key aspect of fascism, which then limits people's access to information. Propaganda often thrives by abusing impoverished people.
Classical economics has its own set of principles. If one doesn't have independent wealth or can't sell their labor on the market, they are considered to have no right to exist. The government has slowly eroded laws that benefit the poor until they take over completely. Neo-liberalism has had a significant impact on the economic and social landscape. In the early 19th century, labor was mobile while capital was immobile, but now the opposite is true, yet we are still taught the old assumptions.
The market has become detached from reality, and the US has had some of the highest tariffs in the world. The suburbanization of the US in the 1950s was a significant development. Cotton was like the oil of the 19th century, and automation has given more control over the workforce. The Industrial Revolution wouldn't have been possible without cheap cotton. Life has become easier compared to 40 or 80 years ago, but there is nothing in mainstream culture to tell us that we have succeeded.
There has been a revolutionary change in moral values. Power has never been and will never be in the hands of the people. The goal should be to extend the domains of popular power and break down centers of concentrated power. The American Revolution had a libertarian ideological structure behind it, but it was only for a select group of white men. We would consider such actions as nazism if another country did the same. This totalitarian society was supposed to be "for the people", but to some extent, this was achieved.
When any victory is won, we will always discover some other form of oppression that we were unaware of. Popular movements have expanded freedom of speech in the past, but it can disappear if it's something nobody likes. The US is unique in protecting freedom of speech, and radio has become a public forum. However, there are also issues like Chinese prison labor and Indonesia's US-backed genocide. The US has been involved in various controversial actions around the world.
The nation state system was established through bloody warfare and ended in 1945. Colonization was extremely destructive, and the concentration of power remains a significant issue. The founding fathers of the US hated democracy, and the rich who invest and fund the country essentially own it. The real work in every historical movement is done by the unknown. The electoral process in the US is just a surface phenomenon, and the US violates international labor regulations. Popular involvement in policy making is crucial, but it is often difficult to achieve.
Middle size corporations can influence state governments, and sometimes we have to accept and use illegitimate systems. We live in a world of absolutist power, and conspiracy theories are very evident, especially on the left. Every editorial decision can be seen as a conspiracy. Conspiracies have flourished in modern American history, and the Kennedy administration gave an illusion of shared power. Human nature is considered corrupt, and society will always have oppressors and the oppressed. However, over time, there has been progress in understanding human nature, and there are opportunities to think about things we didn't need to think about before. The fundamental principles of moral values are important, and we should be cautious of things based on false principles.
A large portion of the American population believes that their children are worse off than them. The only rights people have are the ones they can buy on the labor market, and the economy can sometimes seem like a fairy tale. For the top few percent of the population, incomes have skyrocketed. The union has been broken through various means, and the labor has been divorced from the workforce. Elite planning and corporate greed are major concerns, and there is a continuous class/propaganda war. The civil society in the US has collapsed to some extent, and the US can be considered a fundamentalist country with extreme irrationality in its population. It has been on the verge of fascism for a long time. France's actions in Haiti, such as stealing its resources, are also examples of unjust behavior. If one remains marginalized, there is not much history to worry about, but this is a sad reality that needs to be addressed.
Chomsky is truly a national and international treasure. It is deeply saddening to think that his life won't endure for another 50 years. There is an abundance of excellent content here, and for now, I'll single out one passage. Chomsky was speaking no later than 1999. He said, "Actually, I think that the United States has been in a sort of pre-fascist mood for years. We've been fortunate that every leader who has emerged has been a crook. People should always be strongly in favor of corruption - I'm not joking about that. Corruption is a very good thing as it undermines power. For instance, if we have someone like Jim Bakker, that preacher who was caught having affairs with everyone and defrauding his followers - those kinds of people are fine. All they desire is money, sex, and to rip people off, so they're never going to cause much trouble. Or take Nixon, for example: an obvious crook, he ultimately wasn't going to create that big of a problem. But if someone shows up who is like a Hitler-type - just wants power, is not corrupt, is straightforward, makes it all sound appealing, and says, 'We want power' - well, then we'll all be in extremely bad trouble. Now, we haven't had the right person yet in the United States, but sooner or later someone is going to fill that position - and if so, it will be highly dangerous." So perhaps our saving grace is that Trump is a corrupt grifter.
First, I read Chomsky as a teenager. At first, I couldn't believe what he was saying. His ideas seemed so radical and different from what I had been taught. I was skeptical and hesitant to accept his views.
However, as I delved deeper into his work and started checking the footnotes, something changed. I discovered that his arguments were well-supported by evidence and research. The more I read, the more I became convinced of the validity of his ideas.
I never wanted to be a radical; it was just that the truth was staring me in the face. Chomsky's work opened my eyes to a whole new way of thinking about the world. It made me question the status quo and consider alternative perspectives. I realized that sometimes, being radical is necessary in order to bring about positive change.