...
Show More
I have a passion for sports and also for writing. So, I thought I would surely like "The Sportswriter" penned by the acclaimed author and Pulitzer winner Richard Ford. However, after reading about 25 pages, I came to the realization that I actually disliked this book. But due to my strange inability to give up on a book, I hate-read the remainder of it. Ford seems to belong to the Richard Russo school of writing. He appears to believe that bombarding the reader with an excessive amount of detail will somehow render the book more real or authentic. I say this because "Empire Falls" by Russo was the first book that made me feel this way. A prime example is that all 375 pages of this novel unfold over just one weekend. I knew I was in for a rough ride when the opening scene, which probably took place over the course of twenty minutes, stretched out to 25 pages. We are bombarded with backstories and multiple-paragraph descriptions of people and places that never resurface again! This leaves me wondering why on earth I'm reading about them. I suspect Ford was aiming for some kind of point regarding the intimacy of suburbia or something similar, but I was simply bored to tears. It makes me all the more appreciative of those writers who only include the essential and trim away the fat that serves merely to flaunt the author's vocabulary. The second reason I didn't like this book was that the main character, Frank Bascombe, suffers from what I call the Thomas Mcguane/Julian Barnes Lack of Sack issue. More specifically, this issue should be attributed to the narrators of "Driving on the Rim" and "Sense of an Ending" respectively. Bascombe, like those characters, is a complete and utter pushover. He wrote a successful short story collection and then moved to the suburbs to become a sportswriter. That's fine; that's not the problem. The problem is the endless descriptions of how dreamy and content Bascombe is with the suburbs. Goodness, he loves Jersey, Michigan, safety, and wants to kiss and marry everyone, be polite, and go to church sometimes. He wants you to know how okay he is with everything. It seemed that no matter what happened, he would think, "golly gee, I just need a little pick me up and everything will be a-okay." Part of the reason he quit writing fiction was that he felt fictional characters' issues were unrealistic in their intensity and simplicity, and that real life is much more complex and occurs in shades of gray. And I think Ford was attempting to prove that a character, or a fictional world, could also exist in those shades of gray and still be engaging. I agree with this in principle, but not when the said character is so dreamy and vanilla all the time. It's not a good sign when your narrator keeps describing all the women he's slept with and you think, "Who would sleep with this chump?" The final straw came when, on the same day that he (spoiler alert) gets punched in the face by his girlfriend for repeatedly proposing at inappropriate times and attempts to make love to his ex-wife on the bed of a friend who has just committed suicide, he then seduces a 19-year-old intern at his magazine (bearing in mind he is a 38-year-old divorced father of three). Am I really supposed to root for this guy?