In his introduction from 1952, Eric Bentley briefly touches on Pirandello's reputation at that time. He writes, 'I have met persons who rejected (Pirandello) because of his 'tiresome ideas' without being able to give me even their own version of what these ideas are.' This is a bit harsher than I would like, but it effectively describes my preconceived notions about Pirandello. These notions, formed when I was young and inexperienced, were never truly revisited or revised. Growing up in the Midwest, I had, through cultural osmosis, developed a deep distrust for certain types of art that I suspected were designed solely to mock those like me. The very title Six Characters in Search of an Author seemed to epitomize that kind of art. In my mind, I imagined an elitist snobbery behind such a play, with its enjoyment reserved for a particular stratum and going over the heads of the uninitiated. So, I rejected it to avoid being ridiculed.
Now, this is perhaps too much personal information for a book review, but it happens to closely parallel the themes in these plays that resonated with me the most - the nature of people's perception of things and the reality of those things. More explicitly, people's perception of things is reality for them. In the first three plays in this collection, the characters are constantly faced with alternating versions of what is real, often contradictory and overlapping. In the final two plays, Pirandello exploits the conventions of the theater to shift that uncertainty from the cast to the audience. Is it always successful? Well, reading a play rather than watching it performed seems to diminish much of its inherent power. However, I can say that these plays were intriguing, thought-provoking, and even fun in their presentation, despite the rather dark subject matter. To fully evaluate or appreciate them, I think watching a good stage production is probably crucial, although I don't know how often such productions occur. (There is an adaptation of Six Characters available on Amazon directed by Stacy Keach and starring Andy Griffith - two names I wouldn't have associated with this sort of thing. There is also a 1949 television production from CBS of HENRY IV in the public domain that can be found by googling 'Westinghouse Studio One Henry IV internet archive'. I'd recommend this more for its camp value than anything else.) All in all, I thought these plays were an eye-opener for me. They seem to foreshadow a great deal of literary output (not just theatrical) that followed, and NAKED MASKS is not only a great introduction to Pirandello but also to those modernist works that came after.