...
Show More
The Millionaire Next Door: The Surprising Secrets of Americas Wealthy may have been eye-opening and influential when first published, but it is badly outdated. While the authors do note in an off-hand manner their advice will be most helpful for high-income earners who are looking not to waste all their money, the book overall appears -- and has a reputation for -- being a more general guide on how to get rich. But I found the book's advice not applicable to our current problems at all. For example, the advice is mostly limited to things like, "Don't buy expensive foreign cars" and "Don't live in high-status neighborhoods." But today, when the costs of medical care, housing, and education have sky-rocketed, I don't think buying Lamborghinis and McMansions is why most people have financial difficulties. I mean, this isn't quite "Millennials are poor because of avocado toast!" levels, but it's in that ballpark.
To save time, here's a partial list of my many objections to this book:
1. No index. Seriously???!!! Even though this book is meant for popular appeal, an index is necessary for the type of allegedly research-based conclusions dispensed.
2. The phrase "medical bankruptcy" never appears. The costs of higher education are never addressed.
3. The authors say one's background doesn't help one become rich, and then proceed to "prove" their point by listing the common ethnicities of millionaires. These are things like Russian, German, Scotch ... seeing a pattern? Yeah, they're all WHITE. Except for Native American, which confused me and is one of the reasons I wanted an index. (Reservation land valuations? Casinos?) Anyway, to claim background doesn't matter for wealth and then to list a bunch of different European ancestries as your evidence is just flabbergastingly blind to America's racial issues.
4. I find the advice about not buying homes in high-status neighborhoods particularly out-of-date, as most high-paying jobs have migrated to dense urban areas where housing is expensive. And the authors don't bother to define "high-status." If they mean McMansions, I don't think those are as appealling nowadays as they used to be (they certainly aren't close to where the good jobs are). But if they mean neighborhoods with walkability, transit access, proximity to resources such as libraries and parks, and maybe a little bit of yard to plant a garden and have your children play ... well, to hell with them, those things are worth paying for!!! That's not paying for status, that's paying for quality-of-life and the health of yourself and your children.
5. The authors suggest leveraging your professional knowledge to benefit your finances (e.g., investing in companies you're familiar with from your job). Guess what? If you're a public servant, that's called corruption. Sure, not everyone is a public servant, but it meant this bit of advice was not useful to me at all, and lowered the overall value of the book.
6. The authors gush over how one can use connections to promote one's business/finances, never acknowledging that these connections are often only available to a limited segment of the population. (See Gripe #3 above.)
I guess that's enough for now.
Overall, if you're looking just for inspiration to be more frugal and invest, the many blogs on financial independence out there will serve you better.
To save time, here's a partial list of my many objections to this book:
1. No index. Seriously???!!! Even though this book is meant for popular appeal, an index is necessary for the type of allegedly research-based conclusions dispensed.
2. The phrase "medical bankruptcy" never appears. The costs of higher education are never addressed.
3. The authors say one's background doesn't help one become rich, and then proceed to "prove" their point by listing the common ethnicities of millionaires. These are things like Russian, German, Scotch ... seeing a pattern? Yeah, they're all WHITE. Except for Native American, which confused me and is one of the reasons I wanted an index. (Reservation land valuations? Casinos?) Anyway, to claim background doesn't matter for wealth and then to list a bunch of different European ancestries as your evidence is just flabbergastingly blind to America's racial issues.
4. I find the advice about not buying homes in high-status neighborhoods particularly out-of-date, as most high-paying jobs have migrated to dense urban areas where housing is expensive. And the authors don't bother to define "high-status." If they mean McMansions, I don't think those are as appealling nowadays as they used to be (they certainly aren't close to where the good jobs are). But if they mean neighborhoods with walkability, transit access, proximity to resources such as libraries and parks, and maybe a little bit of yard to plant a garden and have your children play ... well, to hell with them, those things are worth paying for!!! That's not paying for status, that's paying for quality-of-life and the health of yourself and your children.
5. The authors suggest leveraging your professional knowledge to benefit your finances (e.g., investing in companies you're familiar with from your job). Guess what? If you're a public servant, that's called corruption. Sure, not everyone is a public servant, but it meant this bit of advice was not useful to me at all, and lowered the overall value of the book.
6. The authors gush over how one can use connections to promote one's business/finances, never acknowledging that these connections are often only available to a limited segment of the population. (See Gripe #3 above.)
I guess that's enough for now.
Overall, if you're looking just for inspiration to be more frugal and invest, the many blogs on financial independence out there will serve you better.