Camus speaks with remarkable clarity and reason.

His articles offer an eloquent and in-depth exploration of World War 2.

He delves into the various aspects of the war, painting a vivid picture of the events that unfolded.

Not only does he describe the war itself, but he also examines the profound problems it has caused.

These include social, political, and economic upheavals that have had a lasting impact on the world.

Camus' writing is a valuable contribution to our understanding of this complex and tragic period in history.

His insights and analysis help us to better appreciate the magnitude of the war and the importance of learning from its mistakes.

Overall, his articles provide a thought-provoking and engaging look at World War 2 and its aftermath.

A unique selection of Camus' work is presented here, which is full of historical and biographical significances. It encompasses a wide range of aspects. Occupation coverage is included, providing insights into the various occupations Camus was involved in. Additionally, it delves into post-war politics, not only in France but also in Spain, Germany, and the United States. The work showcases Camus' evolving positions on Algerian colonialism and Cold War politics. His philosophical transition is also a key focus. From being a mid-period socialist revolutionary, he later developed into a late-period pacifist and anti-historicist, a transformation that is further explored in "The Rebel." This collection offers a comprehensive look at Camus' life and work, highlighting the important events and ideas that shaped his intellectual journey.

Four stars is an average of the various elements at play here.

The introductory essay by the translator is an effortless 5/5. For those who are delving into the study of Camus or have an interest in the evolution of his philosophy during the mid-40s, it is indeed a straightforward 5/5. It serves as an essential historical document for English-speaking fans of Camus. However, the essays themselves are extremely diverse in terms of both their level of interest and quality. Some of them rank among my all-time favorite pieces written by Camus, especially the editorial he penned just two days after the Hiroshima incident. Nevertheless, a significant portion of it, particularly in the years 1944 - 45, consists of rather vague polemics. If we simply read through it without taking into account the historical context, it would probably rate a 2 or 3/5.

This complex combination of strengths and weaknesses in the collection makes it a somewhat challenging but still worthwhile read for those interested in Camus' works and the historical period in which they were written.

One of the most significant books in history.

The resistant articles of Camus from 1944 to 1947 in the newspaper "Combat" constitute a huge contribution not only to political commentary and combative journalism - the truly combative one - but also to democracy and the anti-fascist/anti-Nazi struggle.

A brilliant mind with a fiery word.

A necessary book.

4.5/5

This work by Camus is truly remarkable. It offers profound insights into the political and social landscape of that time. The articles are not just words on paper; they are a call to action, a rallying cry for those who oppose fascism and Nazism. Camus' writing is powerful and passionate, and it has the ability to move readers and inspire them to take a stand.

The book is not only important for its historical significance but also for its relevance today. In a world where democracy and human rights are still under threat, Camus' words serve as a reminder of the importance of standing up for what is right. It is a must-read for anyone who is interested in politics, history, or social justice.

Camus was an uncompromising moral voice. His editorials were a unique form of opinion journalism that is rarely seen today. They were filled with heart and soul, focusing more on principle than on policy. Camus was deeply knowledgeable about the realities of post-war France, and this understanding shone through in his writing.

What made Camus's editorials truly remarkable was his excellent writing. He had a gift for expressing complex ideas in a clear and engaging way, making his work accessible to a wide audience. His words had the power to move and inspire, and they continue to resonate with readers today.

In a world where so much journalism is driven by politics and profit, Camus's editorials serve as a reminder of the importance of speaking truth to power and坚守道德原则. They are a testament to his integrity and his commitment to making a difference in the world.

Albert Camus writes with a passionate and crystal-clear style about the French resistance and the process of reconstruction that took place after the defeat of fascism. His words are not confined to the context of his own era; they resonate deeply in our time as well.

He emphasizes that deputies and political parties should cultivate a certain degree of modesty, which is an essential requirement for healthy and genuine democracies. After all, a true democrat is someone who acknowledges the possibility that their adversary could be right. As a result, they allow their opponents to express their views and are willing to consider their arguments seriously. However, when parties and individuals become so dogmatically convinced by their own positions that they are prepared to use violence to silence those who hold different opinions, the very essence of democracy ceases to exist.

Camus's insights serve as a powerful reminder of the importance of maintaining an open and inclusive democratic spirit in the face of ideological differences.

Camus' philosophy and writings in the newspaper Combat are of great significance and highly relevant in today's context.

During the difficult times of the resistance, writing in such a publication was extremely dangerous. If the author was discovered, it could have led to death.

I firmly concur with Camus' view that the news should be sustained solely by the revenue from the readership. Although I am aware that this may seem impossible in the real world, I firmly believe that "news" should be free from advertising and sponsors.

The moment a financial deal is struck between the media and a company, the essence of a "free press" vanishes.

In world relations, Camus' greatest concern was silence. The most terrifying scenario he could envision for the world was the loss of a free press and a situation where opposing ideologies believe there is no need for dialogue.

Regrettably, in modern politics, we are either already in or very close to such a reality.

Kristi & Abby Tabby.

The original article:
This is a short article. It needs to be rewritten and expanded.

The rewritten and expanded article:

This is a rather concise article.

It has the potential to be developed and elaborated upon.

By adding more details, examples, and explanations, we can make it more comprehensive and engaging.

For instance, we could provide specific scenarios or case studies to illustrate the points made in the article.

We could also explore different perspectives or viewpoints related to the topic.

In addition, using more vivid and descriptive language would enhance the overall quality of the article.

This would make it more interesting for the readers and help them better understand the subject matter.

Overall, with careful rewriting and expansion, this article can be transformed into a more substantial and valuable piece of writing.

This is a remarkable reprisal of published essays that emerged in the underground newspaper Combat, which was issued in France during the German occupation. Albert Camus served as the editor for numerous years, and there is a compelling argument that the majority of the essays in this collection were his.

He presents several highly significant points and elaborates on his concepts regarding democracy and how to determine whether a republic can be defined as a democracy or not. As is characteristic of Camus, he is intrepid and never wavers in standing before a room full of people and precisely指出 their hypocrisy and what should be done about it. Practically, he was the sole public voice after the liberation who spoke out against the policy in Algiers and held France accountable for feigning democracy while engaging in abusive and rapacious colonialism abroad.

This is an excellent read for our contemporary era. If you have been following the executive orders emanating from our disgraceful White House, you will find these thoughts deeply resonate.

In the midst of chaos, Camus, the writer and journalist, comments on current affairs in a clandestine resistance newspaper. And this exercise is remarkable.

Facing war situations that are as revolting as they are despairing, the writer maintains a sensibility and nuance that impress me.

In "A combat", Camus offers absolutely brilliant articles, an outstanding work of information and advocacy, freedom for all individuals. But here is a philosopher who is aware of his journey, his philosophical path, and who judges his philosophy in light of his own feelings, not completely detaching himself from his sensibility and not compartmentalizing himself in a perfectly rational critique (but potentially blind to the affects proper to the philosopher). In this regard, he distinguishes himself from his contemporaries and pursues a more Spinozist than Cartesian thought, perfectly conscious of his passions and his roots. French, born in Algeria in a disadvantaged environment, his path stands out from that of the intellectual elites of the time.

The article he writes the day after the bombing of Hiroshima is of astonishing lucidity, when one thinks of the context of the time. We are in the emotional, the war is almost won on the Pacific front, it is euphoria, the enemy will soon be defeated. And yet, Camus proposes a disturbing editorial. If he is aware of the imminent end of the war, he knows that the means used (the first use of the atomic bomb, an instantaneous massacre, thousands of civilian lives wiped out in a flash) are humanly unjustifiable. Camus does not give in to either euphoria or rancor towards the defeated enemy, and he cannot endorse the extreme violence of the Allies. He anticipates a new terror, an extremely dangerous weapon that upsets the balance of power in a deeply shaken world, marked by the deadliest war in history, with millions of deaths, and by the trauma of a cold and industrialized genocide, the Shoah.

May these texts be read and inspire thousands of people, with a critical mind, with commitment, and with a conscience of the passions that guide and stimulate us. For me, he is one of the greatest thinkers that the 20th century has given us.

This is a book that has truly impressed me.

The clairvoyance that Camus possessed, his ethical postulations in journalism, in politics, and in life, so well-written and with such clarity, have simply dazzled me.

It should be the essential book for every aspiring journalist or politician.

His defense of the Spanish Republic, of peace, freedom, and justice has deeply moved me.

The article “Why Spain” in response to Gabriel Marcel's questioning of the choice of Spain in his work “State of Siege” is an argumentative gem.

In these highly tumultuous and polarized times that we are living in, where lies are considered equal to the truth, it should serve as a moral reference.

Camus' insights and his unwavering commitment to these values are not only relevant but also crucial for us to understand and uphold in our own lives and in the society we inhabit.

His work serves as a reminder that we should strive for truth, justice, and freedom, and not let ourselves be swayed by the falsehoods and polarizations that surround us.

More about history than poetry

Poetry is often seen as a beautiful and creative form of expression that can touch the heart and soul. However, when it comes to understanding the past, history plays a much more important role.

History is the study of the past, including events, people, and cultures. It provides us with a wealth of information about how our ancestors lived, what they believed in, and how they interacted with each other. By studying history, we can gain a better understanding of our own society and how it has evolved over time.

In contrast, poetry may offer some insights into the emotions and experiences of individuals, but it does not provide the same level of detail and accuracy as history. While poetry can be a powerful tool for inspiring and moving us, it is not a substitute for the objective study of the past.

In conclusion, while poetry has its own value and魅力, history is essential for understanding the past and shaping our future. We should not忽视 the importance of history in our pursuit of knowledge and understanding.

We should continue to study and learn from the past so that we can make informed decisions and build a better world for ourselves and future generations.