...
Show More
If you are seeking a thrilling court drama filled with intense action and shouting individuals, then this book is not for you. However, if you have an interest in law, journalism, or the actual workings of the majority of court cases, then this is the right choice. It was an arduous, captivating, frustrating, and depressing read, and I'm afraid it's completely accurate. The writing itself was outstanding. Several times I paused and thought, 'he couldn't know that...' and'surely he would have...', but after reading all the notes, the author explains how he knew all those facts, quotes, expressions, details, and so on. He was actually there. This book is truly a first for me. I've never come across a more factual non-fiction book that felt so much like fiction. I hope this comes across as a very high compliment to Mr. Harr. He dedicated a significant amount of time to researching, observing, and writing this work, and it truly shows. It's a remarkable piece. Highly recommended for those with similar tastes, but I imagine many others would be bored and frustrated by the lack of action and 'excitement'. No offense to that group, as this is not really a book that appeals to the masses. In order to assess my opinion, in case it's helpful: - I actually find law fascinating and am a bit of a stickler for 'the truth' in non-fiction. - 'The Perfect Storm' was extremely disappointing and poorly written overall. I wish I had continued to put off reading it. - 'Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil' started off really well, but then gradually deteriorated into a pathetic ending.