"Invisible Man" (1952) by Ralph Ellison is a book that invites countless interpretations, starting from its title and never ceasing to offer itself for our understanding. It is not simply a book of allegories or philosophies. There is a plot that grips us, it is a novel filled with events that unfold in a story replete with twists and turns. Beginning in the hot South of the US and culminating in the bustling New York, it is still philosophy in its raw state, emerging from the讲述 of daily life, motivated by the brilliance of depth and detail with which the explanation of that讲述 is filled.
The main character, a black man in the 1920s/1930s in the US whose name we never learn, is initially presented in a traditional coming-of-age novel format. But gradually, we realize how little traditional it is. Marked by chapters or scenes of the character's growing life, almost hermetically sealed, in a diary-like tone that clashes with moments of action and spectacle. However, the spectacle is not used to promote heroism or anti-heroism, generating true anti-climaxes that ultimately contribute to the core of the book, the invisibility of the character. The invisibility starts within the character, with the most immediate reading sense being the effects it has on his behavior. But throughout the entire book, and especially at the end - the flight and fall into a hole - it ends up reflecting on all of us, on what we are in the face of society.
At times, especially in the first half, we are led to think of autobiography or memories. But as the events unfold, we understand that this is only a part of the background. Ellison gave several interviews and wrote, emphasizing that it was not an autobiography. But it was not necessary, as it was enough to pay attention to the psychological and existential references of Dostoyevsky, the gothic and fantastic of Faulkner, or the allegorical and pastoral of Twain. The讲述 moves between confessional realism, aggravated by the use of the first person, and the mythological fantasy that borders on surrealism. This initially raised objections in me, but on turning the last page, it becomes clear that they are vital for the full understanding of the dimension of invisibility. It is a book that speaks of humanity in great depth, using a truly penetrating descriptive tone of the character's interior. However, none of this involves grand philosophical tirades or even great events. In the banality of daily life, the fantastic happens, but it is only on the surface, as it quickly turns into vulgarity through repetition between the past, present, and potential future.
Surprisingly, an American book from 1952 manages to assert itself with such a contemporary premise, and at the same time, one that is adverse to the very culture of the US, the art of failing. In a world and culture so focused on success, only winning matters, and failure is never an option. We have created shame and dishonor for those who fail because failure is the symbol of impossibility, incapacity, and incompetence, a space reserved for losers. However, Ellison presents a character in a coming-of-age novel as a new and empowered man through education, but who fails at every turn. Yet, he is not presented as a loser, as it is from these failures in his relationship with the world that he grows internally and learns to know himself. In a way, we can read a direct relationship here with Dostoyevsky's "Notes from Underground" (1864), regarding its opposition to the perfect world promised by Communism through the presentation of an existentialist world that bases the condition of what makes us human beings.
"Invisible Man" is a masterful novel, and yet, it is the author's first. But if that is not enough to impress us, it is also the only one. Ralph Ellison published this work at the age of 39, after 7 years completely dedicated to its writing. He would spend the remaining 42 years of his life working on a second novel that he never published, leaving behind more than 2,000 pages. Charles R. Johnson would eventually collect 400 pages and publish the book "Juneteenth". Compared to other authors, not speaking of prolific or record-breaking ones, it makes us wonder why? This question does not only arise in literature but in all creative areas, and the most consensual conclusion is: "that probably the author said everything he had to say". In fact, going back to Dostoyevsky, the ideas of his five most important novels - "Notes from Underground", "Crime and Punishment", "The Idiot", "Demons", "The Brothers Karamazov" - could perhaps also have all been synthesized into one great novel.