The English Patient, which I completed last night, has truly made me reflect on my approach to book reviews. In one aspect, this novel had a profound impact on me with its vivid imagery, powerful writing style, and thematically rich narrative. However, there were numerous instances where I almost abandoned the book due to its overly flowery and almost poetic language, along with the constant references to a text that was completely foreign to me.
The ending, in my opinion, was excellent and it helped me to view the preceding pages in a new light. But the question remains: does this make up for the parts that seemed to take an eternity to read? How does one reconcile such conflicting emotions towards a book like The English Patient?
For many Goodreadians, the starred-review is of utmost importance. But I find myself wondering how to rate a novel that I had mixed feelings about. Normally, I would settle for a comfortable three stars, indicating that it was more good than bad. However, this arbitrary rating fails to capture the moments when Ondaatje's writing truly shines, such as when Caravaggio is first introduced and the headlights of the car create a memorable scene. It also doesn't account for the way he masterfully plays with light throughout the book.
On the other hand, I can't ignore the mid-book section set in Cairo that was initially confusing to me. I even had to turn to the internet for clarification. While I understand that some books require multiple readings to fully comprehend, it was still a bit frustrating. Additionally, I need to consider the role of my professional life in my reading experience. With limited time to read, I often found myself feeling lukewarm towards the book.
Despite all of this, I believe that I am better for having read The English Patient. Even though my feelings are somewhat in the middle, I know that this book will stay with me for a long time. It's not the first book I've read this year that has had this effect on me. I may not fully understand all of the nuances of the novel, but I appreciate a book that challenges me and makes me think. I'm also becoming more comfortable with not having a complete understanding of a book when I write my review. The initial impression that a book makes is still valuable.
In conclusion, The English Patient is a complex and thought-provoking novel that had its highs and lows for me. Sometimes it was great, sometimes it was boring, and sometimes it felt pretentious. But overall, I felt a sense of accomplishment for having read it. I'm looking forward to reading more of Ondaatje's work, starting with Warlight, which I picked up after finding it at a discounted price on the day the 2018 Booker long list was announced. Stay tuned for my further thoughts on Ondaatje and check out my first encounter with his writing.
He walked out of the cave, out of the flare of firelight, down through the darkness and into the desert full of moon. pg 249He crafted a dreamlike story with several characters that revolve around the chaos and confusion during war. The story showcases human nature in its most stripped away form: raw emotion and human connectedness as life moves us into an uncertain future. Lastly, the prose was light-handed, skillfully keeping the story mimic the tones of sadness & trauma, kindled romance, and longing nostalgia. After reading this, I pulled up clips from the movie on YouTube and they confirmed exactly what I had envisioned in my head: organic character development, beautiful cinematography, and a haunting soundtrack to accompany. This is the only book to ever bring a tear to my eye. It became my new favorite about halfway through. I can say for certain that I will reread this again in the future. Highly recommended! Thanks!!
«The English Patient» is a vivid portrayal and a snapshot of the era of World War II. It weaves a complex web of love and jealousy set against the backdrop of nations engaged in power games, espionage, and counter-espionage, all culminating in the dropping of bombs, one after another. Hiroshima and Nagasaki. One can understand the revolt of Kip, that admirable Hindu sapper who amputated and dismantled the limbs of evil.
The writing is truly beautiful, but the structure of the book made it very difficult for me to read. I had to go back and forth through the pages, some to better understand and others to delight in again and again, like the descriptions of the desert.
Four main characters are isolated in an Italian villa, stripped of their identities, unable to imitate anything except what they were, with no other defense but to seek the truth in others.
I never saw the movie and only now read the book, which is much more than what I have written about it. «The English Patient» is one of the stories of my sister's life: I recognized her in it, but I also got to know her better.
As is often said: tell me what you read, and I will tell you who you are.
«We are collective stories, collective books. We are not slaves nor monogamous in our tastes or experiences. I only wished to walk on such a land where there are no maps.»
Alrighty, this is indeed an extremely unconventional way to commence a book review. However, the 1996 film directed by Anthony Mingella and featuring Ralph Fiennes, Juliette Binoche, and Kristin Scott Thomas is a cinematic masterpiece that bagged 9 Oscars and still remains one of my all-time favorites. Strangely enough, I had never read the book until this very morning. Ever since its publication in 1992, The English Patient has been adored by many. It is now available in thirty-eight languages and has received the highly coveted "Golden Booker Prize" in 2018 to commemorate the award's 50th anniversary. As I have observed from reading numerous outstanding reviews on Goodreads and other places on the internet, this book is rather polarizing.
Although I agree with my fellow reviewers that the narrative has a certain choppiness as it alternates between the present characters and the burned man's past, I adored it for two very specific reasons. Firstly, the profound reflections on the devastating impact of WWII on the individual characters. Each of these characters finds themselves in a state of limbo, and I was completely engrossed in uncovering where they would all ultimately end up. Secondly, the passionate love story between Almasy and Katharine Clifton. If Robert Redford in Out of Africa made every woman yearn to have her hair washed by her lover, then Michael Ondaatje's Almasy (and Ralph Fiennes by association) probably makes us question why more men are not captivated by our suprasternal (jugular) notch.
I am truly glad that I did not overlook this book! Now, of course, I have an intense desire to watch the movie all over again!