The first aspect that caught my attention at the beginning was how Roth structures his story. He embeds the writer (Nathan Zukerman) as a fictional character within the book, thereby creating the very novel we are reading. From just two encounters and limited factual information, Nathan Zukerman sets out to re-imagine the life story of a real man who was once the role model and hero of his childhood. So, from the start of the main story, we know that it is not entirely true, even within the context of the novel.
The main story itself is simple yet powerful. The Swede represents everything that people refer to as the "American dream." He is a third-generation American, a gifted sportsman, extremely likable, who loves his country, his family, and his life. He always attempts to consider others when making decisions and works hard to deserve his success. However, life treats him well until one fateful day when his 16-year-old daughter decides to become a terrorist, blows up a shop, kills an innocent man, and disappears. She does this in 1968 as a protest against the Vietnam War. That's all. For the rest of the book, he tries to understand why and what he did wrong. He explores various rational and irrational explanations for what turned his child into a terrorist. Although he cannot find the answer, in the process, he sees much more than he used to notice around him, and his "American Pastoral" slowly but inevitably disintegrates before his eyes.
I believe this novel is even more relevant today than it was 20 years ago when it was written. We have witnessed waves of terrorism around the world. I was initially going to write "motivated by the radical version of Islam," but it is far more complex than that. The majority of those terrorists were born and raised in families in the West who, ironically, moved there to ensure the best future for their children. Some of them many generations ago. These families face the same torments of guilt, incomprehension, and shame. Metaphorically, and not just in a literal sense, the whole society faces the same question: how is it possible that some young people view murder as a justifiable means for their purposes (even if it seems idealistically honorable to them)? There is also the question of whether to cooperate with the authorities and what is best for the child involved. It is an unlikely comparison, but Kamila Shamsie deals with a similar dilemma in her recent novel Home Fire.
There are many transgressions in this novel, ranging from the manufacturing process of gloves to the riots in New Jersey in the late 60s. Roth clearly enjoys the writing process and seems not to care too much whether the reader will follow him all the way. Sometimes, I felt slightly impatient with him. Also, I think some people on the left of the political spectrum might find some of his observations not entirely palatable. But fundamentally, it is a masterfully written novel about human nature, as exemplified by the quote: "The tragedy of the man not set up for tragedy that is every man’s tragedy."
Quotes:
There is no protest to be lodged against loneliness not all the bombing campaign in history have made a dent in it.
That people were manifold creatures didn’t come as a surprise to the swede, even if it was a bit of a shock to realise it anew when someone let you down. What was astonishing to him was how people seemed to run out of their own being run out of whatever the stuff was that made them who they were and, drained of themselves, turn into the sort of people they would once have felt sorry for.