Gratitude to the magnificent “Figures” of Maria Popova, Emily Dickinson finally began to take shape for me. I have encountered her poems several times, but it wasn't the right time.
The simplicity, playfulness, sadness, mystery, a stray ray of sunshine, the posthumous echo of a bell lost in time, a bee buzzing in the May grass... Dickinson is actually so clear, so specific, and so revealing. There is something of the Tao in her, spiced with a touch of the American West.
The translation by Tsvetan Stoyanov impressed me - he left all the dashes in their exact places. The illustrations by Tsvetan Kazandzhiev are a magnificent addition - abstract, warm, and somehow strangely specific. And the bilingualism of the edition is a true delight.
***
Sweet Skepticism of the Heart - That knows - and does not know -
Sometimes, the only refuge lies within, where the mind and body engage in a poetic dialogue. In her era, while other poets remained safely ensconced in their established worlds, she ventured along the unbeaten paths, crafting abstract spaces that became palpable through the power of musicality. They adhered to the norms of their art, but hers transcended both the physical and the mental. Writing from a house that others saw as her prison, she transformed it into her artistic fortress.
She was cognizant of external standards yet chose not to conform. While others wrote in harmony, she devised her own rules: using dashes instead of punctuation, employing incorrect spellings, and refining melancholia through her unique language, making it beautiful on the page.
She didn't marry or follow the traditional expectations of a woman in her century. It took time for her art to gain serious recognition. Nevertheless, she continued to write. She wrote to understand the pain she endured, to conquer her fears, and to inspire us to introspect through her words. When she had no friends and was betrayed by lovers, she found solace in Nature and peace in the stillness of the universe.
Over the years, I've read snippets of her poems here and there. However, this edition, this collection, is my absolute favorite. It's a must-have on the bookshelf, one to revisit time and again. I immersed myself in it for a while, relishing Dickinson's words and seeing the world through her poet's eyes as I traced the chronological order of her poems. Arranged by years, from 1850 onwards towards the 1880s, around the time of her death (although the numbering is a bit frustrating as Dickinson's poems rely on numbers as titles), 1877 stands out as my favorite year. It was then that some of her longer poems emerged, at times scathingly introspective and yet inclusive of the natural world, confident and opinionated.
I would highly, highly recommend taking a leisurely stroll through Dickinson's collected verse. She is, quite surprisingly, a highly underrated poet. Delving deep into her entire collection will not only unearth unknown gems but also bring back old favorites. This particular edition, which is organized chronologically, offers a wonderful opportunity to study her growth as a poet and explore the evolution of her obsessions over time. It also conveniently provides the date of first publication, if there was one. It is an absolute must-have for any poetry enthusiast. Moreover, it is highly recommended for those who have a modest interest in poetry. This is because it collects all of the poetry of one of America's most influential, accessible, and subtly complex poets.
Overall, it was rather disappointing. She indeed had a distinct voice and style, and I can understand the appeal it might have for some. However, I felt that her poems were overly repetitive, and there wasn't much that really caught my attention. There was, however, one exception.
Tell all the truth but tell it slant —
Success in Circuit lies
Too bright for our infirm Delight
The Truth's superb surprise
As Lightning to the Children eased
With explanation kind
The Truth must dazzle gradually
Or every man be blind —
This particular poem stood out to me. The idea of telling the truth in a slanted way, of revealing it gradually, was quite interesting. It made me think about how the truth can sometimes be too overwhelming if presented all at once. The comparison of the truth to lightning and the need to ease it with kind explanation was also a powerful image. It made me realize that we need to approach the truth with care and respect, and not just bombard people with it.
Update: I am finally done (after a year of rather inconsistent reading). Now I simply have to commence memorizing...
The outcome of reading the entire Emily is merely a greater sense of curiosity. Now I desire to view the poems as she arranged them, in their packets. The chronological arrangement hints at a biographical revelation that ultimately appears beside the point...
I would rather just regard her inner world as an end in itself. On the other hand, I have also begun an edition of her letters. --She is captivating. I am now pondering how to present her work to students so that they can perceive more than the sometimes-obvious surface.
Update: I have now reached the older ED. At this stage, she is drier, less intense. Two-word abstractions fill entire lines. You obtain the impression of a life lived among a scarcity of objects, in which each object gradually assumes nearly allegorical significance.
I am also of the opinion that ED is a fantasist. She composes something that she wishes to read in order to fuel a certain fantasy of hers--a fantasy of unique suffering, of deferred reward. It is not a fantasy that appeals to me (putting anything off is a poor gamble). But that does not imply that I think it results in bad poetry.
I feel somewhat foolish for not having read this earlier (and I still have not overcome reading Plath so late)--but, on the other hand, I believe Dickinson could have been a powerfully negative influence if I had read her earlier (Plath too). As it stands, I have her rhythms (quietly didactic, like a girl teaching mice) pounding through my head whenever I set the book aside...
--
I loathe to add this, because I know I will be reading it for, oh, the next six months, and then for the ten years after that, but I need to affirm that I am still intellectually active, despite being submerged in freshman composition. Anyway--reading the complete works is quite distinct from reading poems here and there. You gain a greater sense of her world--which oscillates between having a scarcity of objects and being (she protests) abundantly rich enough. You also witness her conflation of various male figures (God, a lover) into some many-faced male Outside. In general, the poetry simply seems deeper. So I must highly recommend reading the complete ED over any selection.