If anything, On Writing: A Memoir of the Craft did inspire me to write:
\\n On Reading: the Thoughts of a Random Reader:\\n
Let me begin by stating that this book is all over the map. It lacks a smooth flow, making sudden and inexplicable leaps from one story to another without any logical precursor. For someone with such extensive experience and knowledge, King did a rather shoddy job of selecting the title for this novel. It has little to do with the contents and is not metaphorical either. However, metaphor is not a favored literary device anyway. According to the author, plain, obvious, and direct honesty is what will resonate with the reader.
There is a great deal I wish to write about, but I'm afraid it won't be possible without revealing too much. Now, I'm well aware that Stephen King has sold millions of copies of his works (he was sure to remind me frequently), and I'm an anonymous nobody who knows little about writing, which automatically disqualifies me from passing judgment. Still, I have this intense urge to express my disagreement with almost everything this book presents as guidelines for writing (I'm paraphrasing King's words in italics below):
1. Various literary devices (adverbs, less common words, passive voice, etc.) will only burden the story and render it unreadable. Really? Since when has language, with all its richness, imagery, and power, become the enemy of a good book? I would much rather have a writer who has overreached with language and failed than someone with a limited toolkit who churns out a suspenseful story on a regular basis.
2. Dialogue is the most crucial part of a book, and very few have mastered it (King being one of them). - Oh well.
3. Physical descriptions of characters are worthless. Their actions are what define them. - From the perspective of an ordinary reader, I have often been more moved by the description of scarred skin, a wrinkle, a crippled leg, a voluptuous lip, or a dimple than by a hundred pages of heroic twists and turns.
4. Audiobooks are wonderful! Sure. I agree that 'Subject-verb' sentences are better heard as background noise while one is performing their mundane tasks. However, they don't call it reading for nothing. To be able to appreciate the beauty of literature, one needs to isolate themselves and follow with their eyes the paths that these magical little squiggles, called words, lead us along. Written language is the magic known as literature. The ears are for the magic known as music.
5. Shakespeare and Yates are both geniuses! Placing these two in the same context seems absurd to me.
6. Good writers are productive. What on earth could they be doing if not writing? - Err, hmm, drinking, wallowing in misery, searching, losing, finding, having a life?
7. Writing is hard work and requires discipline. It involves counting words and setting deadlines. Yet King has never written for the money, but for the immense pleasure he derives from it. - I'm not qualified enough to refute the contradiction here.
8. Readers don't care about literary merits but about the storyline and suspense. They should be the writer's main concern, and therefore the writing should be simple. - This is where things got personal for me. This is insulting to readers who truly love and value language, and it made me recoil in disgust.
I won't comment on the autobiographical section of the book, which was vague and out of place. I won't comment on the tone of the book, which was overly preachy and self-indulgent. I've already said enough to be labeled a 'hater'. I'm actually quite ashamed of my recent one-star reviews and will now go and get a life. No more manuals, please.