I read this book way back when it was initially published in the 1980s. I was still in high school then, with big frizzy hair and way too much blue eyeliner on, and I pretty much loathed my life. I spent most of my free time lurking around the local Osco drugstore, eagerly seeking out the newest horror paperbacks as a means of escaping it all. When I laid eyes on this enormous tome (over 900 pages), I quickly scurried back home with it, convinced I had just struck gold. And indeed I had. It turned out to be one of the very best horror novels I had ever read, and I was reading a great deal back then. This is precisely why I was hesitant to revisit it some 26 years later, fearing that I would somehow taint my memory of what I considered to be fictional perfection.
But I did it anyway. I can no longer read 900-page tomes because the mere thought makes my brain shut down, but I can listen to them on unabridged audio. Swan Song became my constant driving companion for over three weeks, and now that I'm finished, I already miss the soothing voice of Tom Stechschulte. I'll definitely have to snap up something else he's narrated. Maybe "The Road" if I can bring myself to listen to it.
If you've read this book, you already know that it's one of the greatest end-of-the-world novels ever written. If you haven't read it yet and you're a fan of the new apocalypse books that are flooding the shelves, you really need to do yourself a huge favor and read this one. It is set in the 1980s, and we are at war with Russia. Trigger fingers set off nuclear bombs, and kaboom! The world as we know it is gone. The remainder of the book focuses on a cast of characters as they navigate their way through this entirely new world, devoid of all creature comforts such as fresh water, sunshine, and warmth. But out of the destruction, a little magic also blossoms. Two camps essentially evolve. There are the murdering, raping pillagers, and then there are the decent people who yearn to restore the earth and rebuild. The two have an epic, classic collision of good versus evil. Those are the basic bones of the story, but it's so much more than that. It's heartbreaking and filled with loss, yet also with hope, and it is truly worth your time.
A few notes that you should be aware of before delving in:
1. The book doesn't commence with a huge bang. There's ample setup and character backstory here, enough for 3 or 4 modern-day books. Woo hoo for me because I can never get enough of that kind of stuff (when it's good), but perhaps not for everyone?
2. The action takes a little while to get going, but once it starts, there's a lot of it, and it's described in vivid detail. I'm not a huge action fan, and I admit that I did doze off when the military maneuvers dragged on (and on).
3. The book jumps around from group to group. There are a lot of characters to get your head around, and I was a bit confused here and there, but eventually, you come to know most of them very intimately. Many of them are flawed individuals, and they're all transformed by their time on the road. I think I enjoyed that aspect the most. However, be warned that some of these people whom you will grow to love will die, and you will probably cry. Maybe for a few days.
4. This beast is a 34-hour listen. I thought the narrator did a fantastic job with most of the characters. For the most part, he gave them distinct voices, with the exception of the villains at the very end (to me, they all sounded the same, screeching out their scratchy-voiced commands). You may want to find a sample online and give it a listen before committing. 34 hours is an extremely long time if the narrator isn't working for you.
5. There's a heck of a lot of violence, and it's not the prettified, glossy kind. Be prepared.
6. There is a strong, 50ish female character as a lead. Where can you find that nowadays? If you find one, tell me so I can buy it.
7. There is even a tiny smidge of a sweet romance amidst all of the chaos.
See, there's truly something for everyone! Now go read it.
Seems like everyone who has read „Swan Song“ has compared this book with Stephen King‘s „The Stand“ and has an opinion that it was either much better or much much worse than the illustrious bestseller by „The master of horror“. I might be a bit unpopular here, but I didn‘t find that much of a difference in quality. True, I still think that „The Stand“ is a better book, but that doesn‘t automatically mean that „Swan song“ is bad – it's just different.
Of course, these two are also quite different books, despite most of the reviews trying to deny the difference. So, here are the main differences and my arguments as to why „The Stand“ is a better book:
First and foremost, despite both being post-apocalypse books, the setting is quite different. „The Stand“ is about a viral outbreak that spreads conditionally slow and affects only a few species of living creatures, humans included. Meanwhile, „Swan song“ is about a nuclear holocaust and a huge, immense destruction of unseen scale in just a few eyeblinks. Of course, a full nuclear war is much more shocking and attention-grabbing for the very first book than just a few coughs and infected. However, that also leads to a much more serious problem. I think that Robert McCammon just tried too hard and finally overdid the setting. In his book, the destruction is so complete, so big and total, that eventually the ability of survival and adaptation of those few survivors became less and less likely and realistic. There is no food, no clothes, no clean water, no clean air, and freezing temperature due to nuclear winter. The conditions he created seemed and felt impossible to survive in. On the other hand, Stephen King made a much more viable and realistic setting. If you‘re immune, you‘re ok (theoretically, at least). You can go and pick up everything you need to survive. The infrastructure is largely intact, as well as the wildlife. So it‘s not that hard to believe that people can survive and even create new communities.
Second, the characters. The leads are well written in both books, but the secondaries in McCammon‘s book felt more like tools for the progression of the story than real persons. Some „cases“ also were created so stereotypical as to the extent of becoming a laughing stock. For example, one of the first „baddies“ – it‘s not enough that the guy is an asshole, he had also been created as a pedophile and a nazi. Oh, and yeah, he also was extremely obese. In a nuclear aftermath where everybody‘s starving.
King‘s characters might also be subject to critique, but they still feel real, live people.
The Main Villain. Randal Flagg, well, he was spooky. Spooky, full of mysticism and generally, throughout the whole book, you were unable to make a final decision who or what he is and what is his agenda and if there really is something paranormal or unexplainable about him or it‘s just the mass Stockholm Syndrome that his followers are experiencing. The same can be said about Mother Abigail, too.
„The Friend“, (that‘s how the arch-nemesis of Swan is called), on the other hand, feels like a lower level demon from b-movies. All he‘s interested in is killing, ruining, destruction and gore. He‘s a very one-dimensional baddie, compared to Flagg, who, at times seemed quite a nice guy with quite a real goals and aims and ultimately that makes him much more creepier than Friend.
Timeline. I really don‘t understand the jump in time in „Swan Song“. Remember me telling you about extremely harsh conditions, mass starvation and absolute lack of supplies before? So, McCammon decided to solve this by jumping 7 years forward. How those thousands upon thousands survived those seven years is The Question. The Answer was something like „They all had a hard time and had to try really hard“. Oh really? You don‘t say. Ok, enough with sarcasm, but the point about overdoing the setting still remains.
Unnecessary bloodbaths. In „The Stand“, if someone is doing something violent, whether it is Flagg or any random highwayman, it usually has some reason. To force obedience on the masses, to illustrate why someone hates all the men, etc. Violence in „Swan song“ serves only to illustrate how everything‘s ruined and rotten and horrible. It makes a really chilling and uneasy atmosphere at first, but later it just makes no sense anymore because the reader already knows it all and read it all.
Now, based on all I‘ve written here, you might get an impression that „Swan Song“ is an average book. It's not. It still is a very strong, very gripping, very interesting book. All those shortcomings I‘ve listed serve only one purpose – to illustrate that „The stand“ is a better book. A BIT better, I should say.
And if you‘re into this genre, odds are on that you will like the Swan Song. I did. I cannot rate this book 5*, because it had those petty shortcomings I‘ve mentioned, and in the end it might‘ve been just too long, but I‘m quite sure that this book fully deserves a very strong 4*.
The percentage composition of previous or later works of a sort of postapocalypse in the DNA of R. McCammon's enormous horror epic "Swan Song" is an interesting analysis. 41% comes from "The Stand" novel, which is a significant influence. 10% is from "The Road" novel, and it's important to note that it has some elements similar to "Mad Max" which can't be ignored. 10% is from "Blood Meridian" novel, so about 60% of "Swan Song" can be traced back to King and McCarthy alone. 10% is from "Lord of the Rings", with 6% from the battle in "Two Towers" and 4% from the magic ring emblem. There are also smaller percentages from other works like "Lonesome Dove", "Dawn of the Dead" films, "Cold Mountain" novel/film, "Death Race/Death Race 2000" film, "Battle Royale" film, and the "Hunger Games" franchise.
The story involves the country being nuked by the Russians. After everything is destroyed, the survivors start to form feudal groups and new power structures. Evil forces unite, heroes emerge, and characters meet their fates in a way similar to "The Walking Dead". The vigilantes face many hardships, and the story contains gruesome details. However, the book is quite long and starts to lose momentum towards a rather tepid conclusion that the reader may have already anticipated, but it occurs even later.
Despite its flaws, "Swan Song" is still a significant work in the horror genre, and the monoliths of horror it presents are something to be admired.