"Who needs stories of yet another Jew?"
"I need them. Without stories there is nothing. Stories are the world's memory. The past is erased without stories." - 74
"Every story is some kind of explanation, which explains why I dislike stories... I became a historian so I would not have to explain anything, only recount the evidence, the facts." - 251
This collection had aspects that I both loved and hated. For me, a significant part of it boiled down to the frame. The stories were linked in a particular way, with someone eliciting stories from three very different men. This setup raised many interesting questions about the act of remembering past trauma. What do we hope to achieve by remembering? When we seek meaning in trauma, do we distort our memories to fit a narrative? Is there a narrative at all, or is there just chaos and inexplicable cruelty? What responsibility do we have to those we encourage to tell their stories? What are the gains and losses of burying our past? I found myself asking these questions of the earlier two stories, which I might not have done if they hadn't been connected to the issues presented in the third.
That being said, I must admit that I am currently very sensitive about women's voices being overshadowed by men's. So, it didn't sit well with me to see Davita, the protagonist of a novel that had a profound impact on me, reduced to a role where her only value was to make men's voices heard. In one story, she is not even herself; she is distorted through the perspective of a character who cannot see her as she truly is (to the extent that his physical perception of her is incorrect). While I did appreciate learning more about the path she takes, given the kind of role her character played in this novel, I would have preferred an entirely new character.
Also, by using Davita as the framing device and structuring the stories chronologically through her life, Potok, in my opinion, weakened my reading experience. I'll confess that when I read the first two stories, I felt that Potok brought up all these fascinating issues but then did nothing with them. In the third story, he started to address them, but I would have liked to have a better sense of what I should be taking away from these stories earlier in the reading process.
Overall, it was thought-provoking, and I'm glad I read it. However, I didn't enjoy this nearly as much as his other books. :) I guess it's greedy of me to expect him to produce more than five well-crafted novels that have shaped my view of the world.