The author of the book switched tenses throughout, and this really annoyed me. It made the reading experience quite disrupted. One moment, it would be in the past tense, vividly describing events that had already happened. And then, suddenly, it would shift to the present tense, as if the events were unfolding right at that moment. This inconsistent use of tenses made it difficult for me to fully immerse myself in the story and understand the sequence of events. I found myself constantly having to reorient my thoughts and figure out which time frame the author was referring to. It was a distraction that took away from the overall enjoyment of the book. I hope that in future works, the author will pay more attention to maintaining a consistent tense to create a more seamless and engaging reading experience.
A concise and crisp account unfolds of a dedicated cop who achieves the remarkable feat of closing a long-standing cold case, specifically a double homicide. The perpetrator in this case appears to be a true psychopath, lacking any genuine sense of remorse for his heinous crime. Instead, his only emotion seems to be one of regret that he has finally been caught. This account, which has the distinct feel of a New Yorker article, may not be considered great, but it is undeniably good. It offers a glimpse into the world of law enforcement and the tenacity required to solve even the most challenging of cases. The story leaves the reader with a sense of both satisfaction at the resolution of the case and a chilling reminder of the nature of true evil.