...
Show More
What should I do? Should I pretend that I'm not desperately in love with this book? With Raymond Carver's writing? Should I reveal to you that other poetry readers would probably give this collection a 3 or 4 star rating, shrug their shoulders, and toss it carelessly back on the shelf? Should I tell you that readers under 40 might even find themselves unable to relate to the central themes here? I don't care. I don't care! I love this book. I want to own it forever, read out of it forever. Well, not forever, silly. I mean, read it until I die. And, that's the thing, see. Our bodies are all going to die some day, and we won't be able to read, or do a helluva lot of other things, either. And sometimes, just sometimes, we need to think about that. Because denying death doesn't keep it away, it just uses up our energy and keeps us from living. But, this book isn't all about dying. It's also about revelations in mid-life: the power of nature to restore us, the power of regrets to destroy us, the embarrassments of our past mistakes, the freedom (the sweet release!) that comes with the maturity of learning from those mistakes. (For those of us who have chosen the painful learning route). And, beyond this. What you may think of as random, Carver's “scribbles” so to speak. Are never as casual, or as trivial as they appear. Almost every poem of Carver's is loaded. Loaded with wisdom, epiphanies, and powerful language. Carver is a swift imagist, almost a master of juxtaposing light and dark (both conceptually and visually) in his brief verse. He can knock his reader out, quickly, with his shifts. And I want to leave you with my favorite poem in this collection, Woolworth's 1954. May it linger in your mind, as it has mine: Where this floated up from, or why, I don't know. But thinking about this since just after Robert called telling me he'd be here in a few minutes to go clamming. How on my first job I worked under a man named Sol. Fifty-some years old, but a stockboy like I was. Had worked his way up to nothing. But grateful for his job, same as me. He knew everything there was to know about that dime-store merchandise and was willing to show me. I was sixteen, working for six bits an hour. Loving it that I was. Sol taught me what he knew. He was patient, though it helped I learned fast. Most important memory of that whole time: opening the cartons of women's lingerie. Underpants, and soft, clingy things like that. Taking it out of cartons by the handful. Something sweet and mysterious about those things even then. Sol called it “linger-ey.” “Linger-ey?” What did I know? I called it that for a while, too. “Linger-ey.” Then I got older. Quit being a stockboy. Started pronouncing that frog word right. I knew what I was talking about! Went to taking girls out in hopes of touching that softness, slipping down those underpants. And sometimes it happened. God, they let me. And they were linger-ey, those underpants. They tended to linger a little sometimes, as they slipped down off the belly, clinging lightly to the hot white skin. Passing over the hips and buttocks and beautiful thighs, traveling faster now as they crossed the knees, the calves! Reaching the ankles, brought together for this occasion. And kicked free onto the floor of the car and forgotten about. Until you had to look for them. “Linger-ey.” Those sweet girls! “Linger a little, for thou art fair.” I know who said that. If fits, and I'll use it. Robert and his kids and I out there on the flats with our buckets and shovels. His kids, who won't eat clams, cutting up the whole time, saying “Yuck” or “Ugh” as clams turned up in the shovels full of sand and were tossed into the bucket. Me thinking all the while of those early days in Yakima. And smooth-as-silk underpants. The lingering kind that Jeanne wore, And Rita, Muriel, Sue, and her sister, Cora Mae. All those girls. Grownup now. Or worse. I'll say it: dead.